RevenueCat is often used for mobile app subscription infrastructure. Azotte focuses on normalizing app-store, web, partner, and regional subscription operations around one entitlement and lifecycle model.
RevenueCat migration is usually about expanding from mobile subscription infrastructure to a broader subscription operating layer.
Each row shows who manages what, how Azotte changes it, and what happens when you move.
| Aspect | Current way | Azotte way | What changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| App-store making systems consistent | Apple and Google events are central to subscriber state. | App-store events feed the same lifecycle record as web and partner subscriptions. | Map receipts, products, subscribers, and store identifiers to Azotte records. |
| Entitlement authority | Access rights often mirror app product and purchase records. | Access rights define access across mobile, web, partner, and regional storefronts. | Create access bundles that can outlive app-store product identifiers. |
| Storefront handling | Mobile channels are primary; other channels may sit outside the same model. | Storefront type is a channel attribute, not a separate subscription reality. | Link mobile subscribers to web and partner identities where needed. |
| Payment control | App-store payments are managed by Apple and Google. | App stores, PSPs, partner billing, and wallets can coexist in one lifecycle model. | Keep app-store payment authority while normalizing access and lifecycle events. |
| Migration complexity | Subscriber identity and access status must be reconciled across store records. | Azotte provides a single operating record for future channel expansion. | Validate receipt history, access state, refunds, grace periods, and renewal timing. |
Azotte does not replace Apple or Google payment rails. It make consistents app-store subscriptions into broader subscription operations.
